Search for: All records

The emergence of ChatGPT, an AI-powered language model, has sparked numerous debates and discussions. In educational research, scholars have raised significant questions regarding the potential, limitations, and ethical concerns around the use of this technology. While research on the application and implications of ChatGPT in academic settings exists, analysis of the perspectives of high-school students are limited. In this study, we use qualitative content analysis to explore the perspectives of high-school students regarding the integration or ban of ChatGPT in their schools through the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2). Data was sourced from students’ comments to a New York Times Learning Network article. Findings revealed that students' perceptions about integrating or banning ChatGPT in schools are influenced by their assessments of the technology’s usefulness, personal experiences, societal technology trends, and ethical considerations. Our findings suggest that student perspectives in this study align with those of educators and policymakers while also possessing unique perspectives that cater to their specific needs and experiences. Implications emphasize the significance of an inclusive decision-making process around the integration of AI schools in educational contexts, including students alongside other stakeholders. 

Although the fields of educational data mining and learning analytics have grown in terms of the analytic sophistication and breadth of applications, the impact on theory-building has been limited. To move these fields forward, studies should not only be driven by learning theory but also the analytics should be used to inform theory. In this paper, we present an approach for integrating educational data mining models with design-based research approaches to promote theory-building that is informed by data-based models. This approach aligns theory, design of the learning environment, data collection, and analytic methods through iterations that focus on the refinement and improvement of all these components. We provide an example from our own work which is driven by a critical constructionist learning framework, the design and development of a digital learning environment for elementary-school aged children to learn about artificial intelligence within sociopolitical contexts, and the use of epistemic network analysis as a tool for modeling learning. We conclude with how this approach can be reciprocally beneficial in that educational data miners can use their models to inform theory and learning scientists can augment their theory-building practices through big data models.